wolf on the ‘ethno’ and the ‘real’

30Aug10

Perhaps “ethnohistory” has been so called to separate it from “real” history, the study of the supposedly civilized. Yet what is clear from the study of ethnohistory is that the subjects of the two kinds of history are the same. The more ethnohistory we know, the more clearly “their” history and “our” history emerge as part of the same history. Thus, there can be no “black history” apart from “white history”, only a component of a common history suppressed or omitted from conventional studies for economic, political, or ideological reasons.

Eric Wolf, Europe and the People without History, 1982.



No Responses Yet to “wolf on the ‘ethno’ and the ‘real’”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.